Normaal gezien ga ik op maandagmorgen even langs op het speelplein om er het zwerfvuil op te ruimen. Dit kon nu niet daar ik enkele boodschappen moest doen en tevens mijn buurman naar zijn kenisist brengen en terug.
Rond de middag bracht ik enkele flessen naar de glascontainer die vlakbij het speelpleintje staat. Niet alleen op het speelplein lag er zwerfvuil. Ook in de buurt van de glascontainer en de aanpalende parking lag er troep.
Ik besloot dan maar in de namiddag even mooimaker te worden. Gewapend met zak en afvalgrijper ging ik er op af. Aan de picknicktafel zaten een viertal kinderen en een iets oudere tiener. Zo te zien waren ze komen voetballen. . Toen de kinderen – die volgens mij uit het middenoosten afkomstig zijn – me in aktie zagen kwamen ze vliegensvlug op mij af. Ze wilden helpen troep opruimen. Van mij mochten ze om beurten met de grijper iets oprapen en in de zak deponneren.
Een dame die in de buurt woont kwam met haar husky op ons af. De kids waren onder de indruk van die grote hond. Ze wilden hem aaien maar durfden niet. De dame prees de jongens dat ze hielpen zwerfvuil op te ruimen.
De dame ging verder en dat deed ik ook. Met een volle zak vuil kwam ik terug thuis. Het pleintje lag er netjes bij toen ik vertrok, maar voor hoe lang ????
Tot de volgende.
🙂
De dingen des levens ! 
goeie vraag.
voor hoelang?
laat mij raden.
niet zo lang.
Misschien is er door jouw actie een zaadje geplant bij die jongens. Dat zou mooi zijn.
Leuk dat die kinderen wel even wilden helpen. Wie weet, misschien leren ze nog wel dat ze het ook direct in de afvalbak kunnen gooien.
Direct nieuwe helpers, heel lief van ze om mee te helpen.
In ieder geval gaf je een goed voorbeeld, misschien dat déze kinderen nu nooit meer hun rommel zomaar neergooien.
Je bent als oudere een voorbeeld voor de kinderen en je gaat er goed mee om.
Het is zaaien voor de toekomst dat nemen ze mee. Hans
@ een publiekstrekker de schipbreuk, vooral senioren komen kijken.
Ik vrees dat er enkele zijn die weten dat jij daar komt opruimen.
g
Gelukkig weten ze mijn naam en adres niet.
Addressing the Av Mishna of קידושין
The Mishna of קידושין does not simply record dialectical disputes as a form of “preserving judicial disputes.” It functions like a court record. Beit Hillel serves as the Tort judge defense attorney. Whereas Beit Shammai functions as the prosecuting attorney. Now this distinction – significant because it distinguishes lateral common law courts from vertical Goyim courtrooms.
Great Britain operates Common law court rooms just as does Talmudic common law! However, in the case of the British Courts, all statute laws imposed by the British Parliament in London – they define the British Constitution. As such, no common law British courtroom can over-turn any statute law passed by Parliament. Torah common law, known as משנה תורה operates completely differently – despite being a common law courtroom which absolutely requires earlier court room judicial rulings as precedents. Both court systems stand on this shared foundation of common law.
None-the-less ספר דברים mandates “Legislative Review”, a critical interpretation of the intent of משנה תורה. Torah Sanhedrin common law courts have the Torah Constitutional mandate to over-rule any government statute law imposed by any of the 12 Tribes of the Republic or the Central Government of king David. A Torah prophet serves as an agent of the Great Sanhedrin Court. As such prophets can anoint a man from any tribe of Israel – KING.
And Great Sanhedrin Court prophets can remove any king from Office. As the prophet Shmuel did with king Shaul. This fundamental distinction of Torah Great Sanhedrin courtroom powers of “Legislative Review” differentiates Torah lateral courts from Goyim vertical courts. The latter court the State pays the salary of the judges and the prosecuting attorneys. As such a court case pits פלוני vs. the State. The Torah refers to the state paying the salaries of Judges and prosecuting attorneys as “bribes”. צדק צדק תרדוף absolutely abhors bribery; it qualifies as an example of Av tuma avoda zarah?
This abstract term defines the 2nd Sinai commandment. Do not copy the culture and customs practiced by the Goyim and do not marry foreign women who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Judicial justice serves as the כתר Av tohor time-oriented commandment which stands upon תמיד מעשה בראשית. The kabbalah that doing tohor time-oriented commandments creates the chosen cohen people from nothing. Hence the Torah begins with בראשית. Mesechta ברכות teaches that the world was created for the sake of the Jewish people. Who exactly qualifies as the Jewish people? The chosen seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov – the chosen Cohen people.
Obviously, Cohen, Levi, Israel – לאו דוקא terms of reference. A precedent proof, the din that tefillah stands in the stead of korbanot. Amalek – antisemites – continually refer to the Jewish people as a race. The Nazis referred to Jews as “the inferior Race”. Jewish inheritance determined from the mother. However, the central obligation of קידושין, as a pre-condition of marriage, upon the father to educate his children in the oath brit/alliance faith.
Our Mishna compares to ברכות which opens with kre’a shma ערבית, just as the Av Mishna of קידושין opens with האשה. The vertical courtrooms of Goyim jurisprudence the prosecuting attorney prioritized over the defense attorney. But the model of Sanhedrin courts the reverse. The Halacha follows after Hillel!
The Xtian Bible and Muslim Koran both fail to acknowledge that Torah prophets serve as the “police” of the Sanhedrin courts! Hence neither Muhammad nor JeZeus could qualify as prophets. This מאי נפקא מינא distinction equally applies to the acquisition of a wife. The Baal acquires his soul through marriage. The qualifications for serving as a judge in a Jewish court (Beit Din) includes personal attributes and life experiences that are deemed important for this role.
The Talmud suggests that an unmarried man is generally considered less fit to serve as a judge. This is because marriage is seen as a significant life experience that contributes to a person’s maturity and understanding of family dynamics, which can be relevant in legal matters. Similarly, the absence of children can also be viewed as a factor that affects a person’s qualifications.
Having children is believed to provide additional insights into the responsibilities and challenges of family life, which can inform a judge’s decisions. The underlying principle is that judges should possess a deep understanding of human nature and the complexities of life, which are often gained through personal experiences such as marriage and parenthood.
What specifically does a man acquire through wife and family? Answer: Fear of Heaven. A Sanhedrin Judge by definition has an excellent Good Name reputation.
Je doet het toch maar, wat goed van je. Ik ruim het vuil op als ik het zie liggen. Deze ochtend was mijn buurvrouw mij voor. We houden het dus met z’n allen proper, maar af en toe komen er ’s nachts vuilmakers langs: vooral verpakkingsafval van bekers, hamburgers en frieten. En dat terwijl er om de dertig meter een vuilbak staat die nog eens vriendelijk ‘thank you’ zegt. Enfin, we strijden dapper verder.
Volgende week terug een hele zak…
Goed voorbeeld doet goed volgen blijkt maar weer. 🙂
Woorden wekken, maar voorbeelden trekken. Dat hoorde ik vaker als kind. Je ziet dat er grond van waarheid in zit. 🤔
Het blijft een probleem hè…al zijn die kinderen van goede wil en helpen met opruimen.
Jammer toch dat mensen zomaar vanalles achterlaten…
Maar dan ook weer dikke chapeau voor de mooimakers. Jong geleerd is oud gedaan. En die grijpers voelen speels aan voor de jonge helpers.
Tof dat ze je kwamen helpen, misschien doen ze het nu uit zichzelf en zetten ze vriendjes ook aan mee op te ruimen
Je moet maar zo denken, als je het niet doet, wordt het nog erger en komt er ook ongedierte op af.
Love As always
Dimario
Rejecting Religious Rhetoric as False.
Rubies Corner’s Blog·rubiescorner.wordpress.com
Did I Tell You?
I finished my Bible, and now I am reading it again. I have a goal for this year, so I don’t hesitate to pick up my Bible and read for awhile. Since I just finished, I am starting over….
You could try learning the Hebrew T’NaCH – a radically different collection of books – rather than reading your Xtian bible translations. The Hebrew T’NaCH has translations, it even includes the non Jewish chapters and verses which so completely pervert the Xtian bible sophomoric translations. What difference does Order make? God vs Dog.
The T’NaCH organized into sugyot (translated as sub-chapters). What difference does this make? The fundamental basis of the Hebrew T’NaCH stands upon a fundamental question. Does a person learn this literature לשמה או לא לשמה? To quote Shakespeare: To be or not to be — That is the question.
Sophomoric bible translations never once bring the Name revealed in the opening Sinai commandment. Because the Xtian church does not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, it worships their own versions of the Golden Calf. טיפש פשט – translated as bird brained – makes literal translations of abstract obstruse ideas of mussar. This latter term, mussar, it defines the meaning of the word “prophesy”. Prophets command mussar. Meaning that this prophetic mussar applies to all generations of bnai brit who ever walk the face of the Earth.
Prophets do not predict the future as the Roman counterfeit new testament: “fulfill the words of the prophets” falsely proclaims. The Torah refers to this concept of “prophesy” which it describes through the “prophet” Bil’aam; that prophet practiced כשוף – witchcraft or sorcery, practices that involve magical or supernatural powers; engaging in Av tuma avoda zarah – forbidden or occult practices forbidden by the 2nd Sinai commandment.
The Roman forgery known as the new testament employs a lot of Greek rhetoric. Greek rhetoric: undefined critical terms upon which a religious or political witch “hangs” all subsequent ideas. Obama in the 2008 election employed the witchcraft rhetoric of “CHANGE”. The key term that won two Presidential elections for him. Problem: never in eight years did he ever once make any attempt to define this magical term “CHANGE”. The Arab false prophet Muhammad did the exact same thing in his Koran.
The word “prophet” repeated over and again and again. Never once does the Koran ever define the abstract obstruse term “prophet”. The new testament projects a definition of the term prophet, as mentioned above, that duplicates the Torah concept of witchcraft – predicting the future. The Hebrew T’NaCH defines prophesy as “MUSSAR”; prophets do not predict the future but rather their mussar applies equally to all generations. The outcome of this critical T’NaCH definition of this absolutely critical term “prophet” … T’NaCH commands prophetic mussar but it does NOT teach history. This subtle shift requires a bit of time to sink in once consciousness.
Another example of religious rhetoric which the new testament forgery employs, the Apostle Paul, its concept of 1. You are not under the Law. 2. Original Sin of Adam, guilt complex employed to serve as the pretext for the death and resurrection of JeZeus. 1. The rhetoric of “law”; T’NaCH defines “law” as Judicial courtroom judgments – as law. Whereas Roman law exists as rules and regulations imposed by Caesar or the Roman Senate. Paul’s rhetoric “not under the law” fails to differentiate between judicial common law vs. legislative statute law. Hence Xtians “read” their bible sophomoric translations oblivious that T’NaCH instructs judicial common law through a Case/Rule style. This latter type of “law” stands upon the foundation of earlier judicial courtroom “precedent” rulings. Statute law has not such requirement which would force a person to write a ‘legal brief’ and present possible similar and related court room ruling made prior to the current case heard before the Court. The subtle distinction that comes out of making a comparison of similar Case/Rule judicial judgments – the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev which rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah defines as פרדס p’shat remiz drosh sod.
This logic system format radically different from Aristotle’s 3 part Syllogism. Akiva’s logic format – inductive reason; whereas Aristotle’s methodology deductive reasoning. Both systems of logic have their strengths and weaknesses. But Paul’s religious rhetoric: “You are not under the Law”, obliterated any and all distinctions which separate common law from statute law and inductive logic from deductive logic.
The other Pauline term of religious rhetoric: Original Sin. It implies that humanity inherits guilt from Adam’s transgression. The church amplified this concept into a Fire and brimstone Heaven/Hell God/Satan polarity, which later developed into Calvin’s doctrine of complete Human depravity. Based upon the presumption of Paul’s “Original Sin”. Meaning: that the will of fallen Man enslaved in bondage to sin, and individuals cannot exercise free will as their “Moses” liberator who leads the enslaved church to salvation. Herein the requirement for the resurrection of JeZeus. Central to Calvin’s theology, the doctrine of predestination, defines his religious rhetoric. This Golden Calf replacement theology subsumes the Torah Central theme of “the Chosen Cohen People who do service to HaShem through the dedication of tohor middot” to the replacement church which believes in a false messiah JeZeus. The latter term refers to the 13 Attributes which became revealed to Moshe on Yom Kippur 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב/mixed multitudes replaced the Divine Presence Spirit Name with the word אלהים. The 13 attributes, they define the revelation of the Written Torah at Sinai. How?
These 13 “middot” (translated as measurements) breath as living Spirits from within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Air comes from the lungs but tohor spirits come from the heart. Hence the Talmud refers to tefillah as a “matter of the heart”. Whereas the book of the gospel John declares that the Logos/word – not just a spoken word but also a principle of order and knowledge. It refers to JeZeus as the pre-existent divine being. Logos/word rhetoric salad asserts “the Word was God” which establishes the belief in the full divinity of JeZeus.
The revelation of the Golden Calf rejects substitute theology as the definition of Av tuma (evil inclination spirits within the heart called Yatrir Ha’Rah) of avoda zarah (often mistranslated as idolatry). Therefore then how does the Hebrew T’NaCH “study” rather than simply read Common law (משנה תורה)? The first book of בראשית introduces Av tohor mitzvot – known as time-oriented commandments. The next three books of the Written Torah introduce secondary commandments (תולדות) which function as legal precedents. The last 5th book of the Torah (משנה תורה) confirms the mandate of judicial common law as ‘Legislative Review’. Meaning the common law Sanhedrin courts have not only a veto over lower government statute laws but can entirely re-write the lower government statute law and present them now as Torah common laws.
In short, Paul’s religious rhetoric of “Original Sin” supplanted the main Torah theme of exile/g’lut as expressed through Adam’s expusion from the Garden, Noach’s Ark, the enslavement of Israel in Egypt, and the 40 year Wilderness story.
Dat zijn kinderen die respect hebben voor de (oudere) medemens. Is heel normaal in die landen.
Oorzaak en gevolg. Het slordig omgaan met volle afvalbakken of de reiniging daar van zorgt voor een andere mentaliteit. Ik zie dat in onze stad ook. Als je dan op je handen blijft zitten als overheid heb je heel wat vrijwilligers nodig om de troep weg te halen. Omdat wij hier een stevig jaarlijkse bijdrage leveren aan de gemeentekas voor juist dat reinigen/schoonhouden ga ik niet ook nog eens vrijwillig aan de slag. Dat geld van de belastingbetaler wordt gewoon niet goed ingezet… Maar..compliment dat jij dat wel doet…
Zwerfvuil heb ik ook hekel aan. Ik zag bij ons parkeer plaatst soort chips buis liggen. Opgeruimd! Wat fijn dat kinderen ook mee helpen om te ruimen. Kijk eens dit is goede voorbeeld. Hier bij ons niet….. Speelplaats is weer schoon. Fijne dag.
Mogge Suske
hopelijk doet goed voorbeeld volgen en geven deze jongens het door aan alles hun vrienden
geniet de dag
Ja voor hoe lang hé.
Aum Shanti
dat is heel fijn dat je nieuwe helpers hebt. Maar dat zal niet elke keer zijn denk ik:-)
Misschien dat goed voorbeeld goed doet volgen. Geef die kinderen een klein grijpertje en je hebt…eh… geen kind meer aan ze.
Ik denk als je over een week weer gaat, dat er wel al weer wat valt op te ruimen.